OFIR Blog

Welcome to the new OFIR blog!

OFIR invites you to pop in regularly and find out what's new, what's pressing and needing action and what other concerned citizens are doing in the fight to stop illegal immigration.

Just who is the Oregon Legislature working for?

The Oregon Legislature has failed to pass a bill giving instate tuition benefits to illegal alien students for the past 10 years. Now, with the Democrats running the show, and some very misguided Republicans in their pocket, they are once again attempting to ram this bill down our throats. While this poll is not scientific, it is certainly open to anyone to express their opinion. If it's such a great idea, why does it fare so poorly in the Statesman Journal poll? Ask your Representative if they voted in favor of the HB 2787, passing it out of the House and sending it over to the Senate.

The House passed a bill allowing in-state tuition rates for undocumented immigrant students. If it becomes law, do you believe it will be beneficial for Oregon?

Yes 13%

No 84%

Don’t Know 1%

Total Votes: 349

OFIR billboard campaign in full swing

OFIR strives to educate the public about the real story behind illegal immigration.  FAIR recently released an in depth study finding that Oregonians spend ONE BILLION DOLLARS every year on services to illegal aliens.

As well, the Oregon Legislature is rushing to pass an instate tuition bill with no limits on numbers, no sunset clause, and an open taxpayers checkbook.

If you aren't outraged...you aren't paying attention!

Visit OFIR's photo gallery for a look at our billboards.  If you have ideas for future signs, contact OFIR.  If you like what you see, let OFIR know and perhaps contribute to help fund the campaign.
 

David Cross tracks the folly of HB 2787

David Cross, in factual detail, explains the folly of HB 2787.  Read his just published guest opinion to find out how taxpayers are being snookered by not paying attention to the details of this bill.
 

These employers support American workers

A complete list of employers using E-Verify who have 5 or more employees is now available to the public on the website of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. The system for searching the list has recently been simplified and improved. The list is current as of Dec. 15, 2012, and is expected to be updated quarterly.

Nearly 400,000 employers nationwide have enrolled in E-Verify. As of Dec.13, 2012, in Oregon, 2,628 employers had enrolled. These figures include only employers of 5 or more persons. There are many small employers who use E-Verify also; but as they are very small, their privacy is respected and their names are not included in the public list.

The public list can be searched by name of employer, state, town, or zip code. The data includes number of employers at each establishment. (All in the public list have 5 or more employees.)

“The search tool includes exciting features such as the capability to filter, sort, and export employer results,” says the USCIS announcement.

Also the agency has posted online a very helpful User Guide, 17 pages long, explaining in detail how to use the search system and including many graphics illustrating what can be found in the database and how to proceed in the search.

The User Guide as well as a set of questions and answers can be viewed and downloaded from links on this page:

http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.fa065d7a1a6674927e1e1c10526e0aa0/?vgnextoid=1c9434bacc30a310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=1c9434bacc30a310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD

Give this new resource a try!

Locate E-Verify employers in your town, thank them, and if feasible, patronize their businesses.   E-Verify Employers Search Tool

NOTE:  To any any business that would like to be featured on our OFIR website, we invite you to visit our Choose to Use link and learn more.

OR Legislature puts the law before the horse

Rep. Michael Dembrow and his band of co-horts are attempting to usurp Federal law by not only allowing foreign nationals, most likely illegally in our country to remain here, but now they want to give them an instate tuition benefit so they can attend college here.

I have asked this question repeatedly and not gotten an answer:                                                                                                                                                      How will these students and their parents pay for college?  Several students testified that they or their parents are working 2 or 3 jobs already.             Is that not another law being broken?

Is it just me...am I the only one who thinks we have we become too 'tolerant' of these lawbreakers?  To think that we can sit in the State Capitol Building - the hub of lawmaking in Oregon - surrounded by kids that freely admit they are here illegally and so are their parents and siblings.  They admit they are working several jobs (and most likely driving to those jobs without a license or insurance). And nothing happens to them.  "Living in the shadows", haha...it wouldn't appear so.

Barely allowing testimony from the opposition at yesterdays hearing, these legislators hope to pass a bill that would allow these student lawbreakers to be awarded the opportunity to pay instate tuition at our colleges and universities. 

Then what?  We will have subsidized the college education of illegal aliens who will be competing for jobs with college graduates that are US citizens.                Sounds like people need to stop and think first.  This is a bad idea.

When does this stop?  When do we finally say enough is enough?

 


 

Congress...are you listening?

Elizabeth Van Staaveren hits the nail on the head with her message of attrition through enforcement in her recent letter published in the Statesman Journal.  Let your elected officials know that another sweeping amnesty solves nothing.  True enforcement of existing laws is where we begin solving the illegal immigration issue.

Guzzardi shines a light on the lies

Senior Writing Fellow Joe Guzzardi, of CAPS, lets the light shine on the empty promises and dirty dealing surrounding the President's proposed sweeping amnesty proposal.  Read the full article.
 

OFIR launches billboard campaign

When you are out and about driving in Salem, please keep your eyes on the road...but, try and sneak a look at OFIR's new digital billboard. For the next week, it will run on Mission St. and 17th St. 

OFIR is hoping to catch the attention of Legislators on their way to the Capitol. 

Throughout the month it will move around town, so keep an eye out for it.  If you see it, let OFIR know what you think of it!  

OFIR would appreciate your feedback and your ideas for future campaigns.

If you would like to see more billboards, consider a contribution to OFIR to help defray the cost.  OFIR members' past donations have made this campaign possible.

We the people have an opinion...are you listening?

While the following poll is not scientific and the question offered gives a limited number of choices, it seems clear what the public is thinking.

Enforce the law!  It's against the law to hire an illegal alien to work for you.  If illegal aliens could not find a job here, they would likely move on, or return to their native country.

It's quite telling that the Oregon Legislature, in the past, has refused to even hear a bill that was written requiring all state employers to use the FREE, 99.6% accurate and easy to use E-Verify matching program.  In other words, if the State of Oregon, using taxpayer money, needs to hire someone for a job, they are not required to be certain they are hiring a LEGAL worker.  How ridiculous is that? With over 160,000 unemployed Oregonians, wouldn't you think the State should hire one of those workers and not an illegal alien?

The bill has been posted again for the upcoming 2013 session of the Oregon Legislature.  House Bill 2358 is sponsored by Representative Thatcher, Representatives Weidner and Whisnant.

Please, contact your Legislator and ask them to support this bill.  It's a no cost solution to a problem that is only getting bigger everyday.

If they don't hear from you, they will succumb to the pressure of the pro-illegal alien advocacy groups that are pushing for even more rights and benefits for foreign nationals illegally present in our country.

StatesmanJournal.com

POLL RESULTS

YESTERDAY’S QUESTION

Which immigration reform proposed by the White House or Senate is most important to you?

- Providing those in the U.S. illegally a path to become citizens – 1.9%

- Strengthening border security — 31.1%

- Cracking down on employers who hire illegal immigrants – 52.4%

- Streamlining the legal immigration system – 1.2%

- All of the above – 12.2%

- None of the above – 1.3%

(Yesterdays online poll results appeared in the January 31, 2013 hardcopy Statesman Journal newspaper.)

DACA - just another form of amnesty

One of OFIR's original founders, Elizabeth VanStaaveren spells out the meaning behind the madness of the DACA -  Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.  Read the full article here.

The one billion dollar elephant in the room

OFIR Vice President Rick LaMountain hit the nail on the head again in this just published article.

Poll results don't support Legislature's plans

These are the final results of the Statesman Journal’s online poll yesterday. Results were printed in the hardcopy edition of the newspaper today, January 28, 2013. The paper’s practice is to give results in the print edition the day after each poll closes, and results are not posted online after the poll has closed.

Statesman Journal, Monday, Jan. 28, 2013, p.5C (editorial page)

POLL RESULTS TO YESTERDAY’S QUESTION

Should immigrants in Oregon be allowed to pay in-state college tuition if they met these conditions?

- 3 years in Oregon high school

- Graduation from Oregon High school

- Admission to a state university

- Actively working toward U.S. citizenship

Yes 31.5%

No 66.6%

Don’t Know 1.4%

Don’t Care 0.5%

---------------------------------

Several OFIR members objected to the wording of the question, which omitted the word “illegal” in referring to immigrants. In the context of the paper’s recent coverage of immigration issues, it is reasonable to assume the question meant illegal immigrants, and most viewers read the question that way. Of course the question should have been made clear to all by specifically referring to illegal immigrants, not just “immigrants.”

Pages